La percepción del alumnado sobre AICLEEl caso de Andalucía

  1. Adrián Granados 1
  1. 1 Universidad Pablo de Olavide
    info

    Universidad Pablo de Olavide

    Sevilla, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02z749649

Revista:
Elia: Estudios de lingüística inglesa aplicada

ISSN: 1576-5059

Año de publicación: 2023

Número: 23

Páginas: 189-215

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: Elia: Estudios de lingüística inglesa aplicada

Resumen

Este estudio pretende realizar una evaluación a gran escala de la percepción del alumnado sobre AICLE en Andalucía. Para ello, se seleccionaron 58 centros bilingües con inglés como L2 (29 de primaria y 29 de secundaria) mediante muestreo aleatorio estratificado, considerando el nivel socioeconómico y la distribución geográfica. Se encuestó al alumnado de último curso de cada centro (N= 2014). La encuesta estaba en español y consistía en preguntas cerradas sobre la metodología AICLE, el uso de la L2 y las actividades extracurriculares. Se preguntó al alumnado sobre la frecuencia con que realizaban determinadas actividades en clase, cuáles eran sus favoritas, con qué frecuencia y finalidad utilizaban la L2 durante las clases de contenido, qué actividades complementarias ofrecía el centro y si pensaban que el aprendizaje en una L2 afectaba a su adquisición de contenidos. Los resultados muestran que, aunque el alumnado AICLE tiene una actitud mayoritariamente positiva hacia el programa, sus actividades preferidas no coinciden con las más utilizadas en clase. También que existe un desequilibrio entre el uso de la L2 escrita y la oral, con la comunicación oral desempeñando un papel secundario. Además, se observan diferencias entre la percepción de los alumnos de primaria y de secundaria.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Abello-Contesse, C., Chandler, P., López-Jiménez, M. D., & Chacón-Beltrán, R. (2013). Bilingual and Multilingual Education in the 21st Century. Building on Experience. Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783090716
  • Alonso-Belmonte, I., & Fernández-Agüero, M. (2021). Teachers’ narratives of resistance to Madrid’s bilingual programme: An exploratory study in secondary education. Linguistics and Education, 63, 100925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2021.100925
  • Andalusian Department of Education (2005). Acuerdo de 22 de marzo de 2005. BOJA, 65, 8-39.
  • Andalusian Department of Education (2017). Administrative resolution of 10 May, by the Andalusian Department of Education, regulating the diagnostic tests for Primary Education and Compulsory Secondary Education in the academic year 2016/17. https://www.adideandalucia.es/normas/resoluc/Resolucion10mayo2017EvaluacionesFinalesMuestral
  • Anghel, B., Cabrales, A., & Carro, J. M. (2016). Evaluating a bilingual education programme in Spain: The impact beyond foreign language learning. Economic Inquiry, 54(2), 1202–1223. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12305
  • Barrios, E., & Acosta-Manzano, I. (2022) Primary students’ satisfaction with CLIL and perceived CLIL linguistic difficulty. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 43(7), 665-678. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2020.1759610
  • Barrios, E., & Milla Lara. M. D. (2020) CLIL methodology, materials and resources, and assessment in a monolingual context: an analysis of stakeholders’ perceptions in Andalusia. The Language Learning Journal, 48(1), 60-80, https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2018.1544269
  • Benati, A. (2018). Grammar-Translation Method. In Liontas, J. I., T. International Association & M. DelliCarpini (Eds.), The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0153
  • Bruton, A. (2011). Is CLIL so beneficial, or just selective? Re-evaluating some of the research. System, 39(4), 523-532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2011.08.002
  • Cabezuelo Gutiérrez, P., & Fernández Fernández, R. (2014). A case study on teacher training needs in the Madrid bilingual project. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 7(2), 50-70. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2014.7.2.3
  • Chaieberras, Z. (2019). Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL): A qualitative study in Compulsory Secondary Education in the Community of Madrid (Spain) [Doctoral dissertation, Universidad de Jaén]. RUJA
  • Chall, J. (1996). Stages of reading development, 2nd ed. Harcourt Brace.
  • Coyle, D. (2013). Listening to learners: an investigation into ‘successful learning’ across CLIL contexts. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16(30), 244-266. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2013.777384
  • Darn, S. (2006). Content and language integrated learning (CLIL): A European overview. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED490775.pd f
  • Dobson, A., Pérez Murillo, M. D., & Johnstone, R. (2010). Programa de Educación Bilingüe en España: Informe de la evaluación. British Council & Ministerio de Educación.
  • Doiz, A., Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M. (2014). CLIL and motivation: The effect of individual and contextual variables. Language Learning Journal, 42, 209-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2014.889508
  • Durán-Martínez, R., & Beltrán-Llavador, F. (2016). A regional assessment of bilingual programmes in Primary and Secondary schools: The teachers’ views. Porta Linguarum, 25, 79-92. https://doi.org/10.30827/Digibug.53890
  • Ellis, R. (2015). Understanding second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.
  • European Commission (1995). White paper on education and training. Teaching and learning: Towards the learning society. European Commission.
  • Fernández, R., & Halbach, A. (2011). Analysing the situation of teachers in the Madrid bilingual project after four years of implementation. In Ruiz de Zarobe, Y., Sierra, J., & F. Gallardo del Puerto (Eds.), Content and foreign language integrated learning (pp. 241-270). Peter Lang.
  • Fernández-Agüero, M., & Hidalgo-McCabe, E. (2022) CLIL Students’ Affectivity in the Transition between Education Levels: The Effect of Streaming at the Beginning of Secondary
  • Education. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 21(6), 363-377. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2020.1795864
  • Fernández-Sanjurjo, J., Fernández-Costales, A., & Arias Blanco, J. M. (2019). Analysing students’ content-learning in science in CLIL vs. non-CLIL programmes: empirical evidence from Spain. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(6), 661-674. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2017.1294142
  • Gerena, L., & Ramírez-Verdugo, M. D. (2014). Analyzing Bilingual Teaching and Learning in Madrid, Spain: A Fulbright Scholar Collaborative Research Project. Gist Education and Learning Research Journal, 8, 118-136. https://doi.org/10.26817/16925777.117
  • Granados, A., & Lorenzo, F. (2022). A tale of two cities: The ideological debate on equity in bilingual schooling. AILA Review, 35(2), 203–226. https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.22019.gra
  • Halbach, A., & Iwaniec, J. (2020). Responsible, competent and with a sense of belonging: an explanation for the purported levelling effect of CLIL. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(5), 1609-1623. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2020.1786496
  • Heras, A., & Lasagabaster, D. (2015). The impact of CLIL on affective factors and vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 19(1), 70–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814541736
  • Hidalgo-McCabe, E., & Fernández-González, N. (2019) Framing “choice” in language education: The case of freedom in constructing inequality. In Martín-Rojo, L. & A. Del Percio (coord.), Language and Neoliberal Governmentality (pp. 69-90). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429286711-4
  • Housen, A. (2002). Processes and Outcomes in the European Schools Model of Multilingual Education. Bilingual Research Journal, 26(1), 45-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2002.10668698
  • Lancaster, N. K. (2016). Stakeholder perspectives on CLIL in a monolingual context. Canadian Center of Science and Education, 9(2), 148-177. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n2p148
  • Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M. (2010). Immersion and CLIL in English: more differences than similarities. ELT Journal, 64(4), 367–375. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccp082
  • Lasagabaster, D., & Doiz, A. (2017). A Longitudinal Study on the Impact of CLIL on Affective Factors. Applied Linguistics, 38(5), 688-712. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amv059
  • Little, D. (2012). The European Language Portfolio: history, key concerns, future prospects. In Kühn, B. & M. L. Pérez Cavana (Eds.), Perspectives from the European Language Portfolio (pp. 22-42). Routledge.
  • Llinares, A., & Evnitskaya, N. (2021). Classroom Interaction in CLIL Programs: Offering Opportunities or Fostering Inequalities? TESOL Quarterly, 55(2), 366-397. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.60
  • Lorenzo, F., & Granados, A. (2020). One generation after the bilingual turn: Results from a large-scale CLIL teachers’ survey. Estudios de Lingüística Inglesa Aplicada, 20, 77-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.12795/elia.2020.i20.04
  • Lorenzo, F., & Moore, P. (2009). European language policies in monolingual southern Europe. Implementation and outcomes. European journal of language policy, 1(2), 121-135. https://doi.org//10.3828/ejlp.2009.3
  • Lorenzo, F., Casal, S., & Moore, P. (2010). The Effects of Content and Language Integrated Learning in European Education: Key Findings from the Andalusian Bilingual Sections Evaluation Project. Applied Linguistics, 31(3), 418–442. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp041
  • Lorenzo, F., Granados, A., & Rico, N. (2021). Equity in bilingual education: socioeconomic status and content and language integrated learning in monolingual Southern Europe. Applied Linguistics, 42(3), 393-413. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/amaa037
  • Loumbourdi, L. (2018). Communicative Language Teaching. In Liontas, J. I., T. International Association & M. DelliCarpini (Eds.), The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0167
  • Marsh, D. (2002). CLIL/EMILE. The European dimension. Actions, trends, and foresight potential. University of Jyväskylä.
  • Milla Lara, M. D., & Casas Pedrosa, A. V. (2018). Teacher perspectives on CLIL implementation: A within-group comparison of key variables. Porta Linguarum, 29, 159-180. https://doi.org/10.30827/Digibug.54032
  • Navarro-Pablo, M., & García Jiménez, E. (2018). Are CLIL Students More Motivated? An Analysis of Affective Factors and their Relation to Language Attainment. Porta Linguarum, 29, 71-90. https://doi.org/10.30827/Digibug.54023
  • Navarro-Pablo, M., & López Gándara, Y. (2020) The effects of CLIL on L1 competence development in monolingual contexts. The Language Learning Journal, 48(1), 18-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2019.1656764
  • Nikula, T., & Moore, P. (2019) Exploring translanguaging in CLIL. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(2), 237-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2016.1254151
  • Oxbrow, G. L. (2018). Students’ Perspectives on CLIL Programme Development: A Quantitative Analysis. Porta Linguarum, 29, 137-158. https://doi.org/10.30827/Digibug.54026
  • Pavón, V., Lancaster, N., & Bretones, C. (2019). Keys issues in developing teachers’ competences for CLIL in Andalusia: training, mobility and coordination. The Language Learning Journal, 48(1), 81-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2019.1642940
  • Pérez Cañado, M. L. (2018). The Evolution of Bilingual Education in Monolingual Contexts: An Andalusian Case Study. In Romanowski, P., & M. Jedynak (Eds.), Current Research in Bilingualism and Bilingual Education (pp. 207-241). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92396-3_12
  • Pérez, A., Lorenzo, F., & Pavón, V. (2016). European bilingual models beyond lingua franca. Key findings from CLIL French programs. Language Policy, 15(4), 485-504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-015-9386-7
  • Pladevall-Ballester, E. (2015) Exploring primary school CLIL perceptions in Catalonia: students’, teachers’ and parents’ opinions and expectations. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 18(1), 45-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2013.874972
  • Rascón, D., & Bretones, C. M., (2018). Socioeconomic status and its impact on language and content attainment in CLIL contexts. Porta Linguarum, 29, 115-135. https://doi.org/10.30827/Digibug.54025
  • Rascón, D. (2020). Student perspectives on dual immersion in California: A comparison with the perceptions of CLIL learners in Madrid. Linguistics and Education, 61, 100887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2020.100887
  • Sanacore, J., & Palumbo, A. (2008) Understanding the Fourth-Grade Slump: Our Point of View. The Educational Forum, 73(1), 67-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131720802539648
  • Sotoca, E. (2016). La repercusión del bilingüismo en el rendimiento académico en alumnos de colegios públicos de la Comunidad de Madrid. Revista Complutense de Educación, 25(2), 481-500. http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/rev_RCED.2014.v25.n2.41732
  • Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sport (2017). ‘Order ECD/393/2017, of 4 May, regulating the final assessment for Compulsory Secondary Education in the academic year 2016/2017. Boletín Oficial Del Estado, 108, 36868-97.
  • Sterling, S., & Loewen, S. (2018). Games. In Liontas, J. I., T. International Association & M. DelliCarpini (Eds.), The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0186
  • Ushida, E. (2005). The role of students’ attitudes and motivation in second language Learning in online language courses. CALICO Journal, 23(1), 49-78. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v23i1.49-78
  • Vez, J. M. (2009). Multilingual education in Europe: Policy developments. Porta Linguarum, 12, 7-24. https://doi.org/10.30827/Digibug.31856
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet