Pensamiento militar ruso y suposiciones sobre la zona gris y la guerra en Ucrania

Referencias bibliográficas

• Adams, d. (2021). moscow’s aerospace theory of victory: Western assumptions and russian reality. alexandria (estados unidos): center for naval analyses. (https://cutt.ly/rmvbelc).
• Arabia, c.; Bowen, a.; Welt, c. (2022, 21 de octubre). u.s. security assistance to ukraine. Washington dc (estados unidos): congressional research service. (https://cutt.ly/tmvHZsd).
• Asymmetric Warfare group (2017). russian new generation Warfare Handbook. Fort eustis (estados unidos): united states army training and doctrine command. (https://cutt.ly/lmvKmvZ).
• Ball, t. (2022, 11 de abril). Putin “Purges” 150 FsB agents in response to russia’s Botched War with ukraine. the times. (https://cutt.ly/nmvZsyo).
• Barnes, j. (2022, 3 de febrero). u.s. exposes What it says is russian effort to Fabricate Pretext for invasion. new york times. (https://cutt.ly/jmvZlzy).
• Barrie, d.; Hackett, j. (eds.) (2020). russia’s military modernisation. an assessment. londres (reino unido): international institute for strategic studies.
• Barry, B.; Barrie, d.; Béraud-sudreau, l.; Boyd, H.; childs, n.; giegerich, B. (2019). defending europe: scenario-based capability requirements for nato’s european members. londres (reino unido): international institute for strategic studies. (https://cutt.ly/nmvFs6F).
• Bendett, s.; Boulègue, m.; connolly, r.; Konaev, m.; Podvig, P.; Zysk, K. (2021). advanced military technology in russia. capabilities and implications. londres (reino unido): chatham House. (https://cutt.ly/nmHy9ym).
• Bērziņš, j. (2020). the theory and Practice of new generation Warfare: the case of ukraine and syria. the journal of slavic military studies, 33(3), 355-380. doi:10.1080/13518046.2020.1824109.
• Bowen, a. (2022, 14 de septiembre). russia’s War in ukraine: military and intelligence aspects. Washington dc (estados unidos): congressional research service. (https://cutt.ly/jmvjma0).
• Braw, e. (2022). the defender’s dilemma: identifying and deterring gray-Zone aggression. Washington dc (estados unidos): aei Press.
• Brose, c. (2020). the Kill chain: defending america in the Future of High-tech Warfare. nueva york (estados unidos): Hachette. calvo, j. (2022a, 20 de enero). rusia en ucrania. el despertar de la fuerza. global strategy. (https://cutt.ly/omK7Zaa). calvo, j. (2022b). Primeras impresiones militares. in g. colom-Piella (ed.), la guerra de ucrania: los 100 días que cambiaron europa (pp. 65-94). madrid (españa): catarata-ejércitos.
• Colom-Piella, g. (2018). la doctrina gerasimov y el pensamiento estratégico ruso contemporáneo. ejército, 933, 30-37.
• Colom-Piella, g. (2019, 22 de marzo). la amenaza híbrida: mitos, leyendas y realidades. documento de opinión del ieee, 24, 1-14. (https://cutt.ly/emHjrnr).
• Colom-Piella, g. (2020). anatomía de la desinformación rusa. Historia y comunicación social, 25(2), 473-480. doi:10.5209/hics.63373. cranny-evans, s. (2021, 24 de noviembre). russia vs ukraine: Flaws in Western gray Zone theories. commentary rusi. (https://cutt.ly/gmHZk69).
• Cranny-evans, s.; Kaushal, s. (2022, 1 de abril). the intellectual failures behind russia’s Bungled invasion, commentary rusi. (https://cutt.ly/nmvZWyW). dalsjö, r.; jonsson, m.; norberg, j. (2022). a Brutal examination: russian military capability in light of the ukraine War. survival, 64(3), 7-28. doi:10.1080/00396338.2022.2078044. defense intelligence agency (2017). russia military Power: Building a military to support great Power aspirations. Washington dc (estados unidos): dia. (https://cutt.ly/gmvza5r).
• Frías, c. (2022, 5 de abril). ucrania y el ejército ruso: primeras impresiones (i). documento de opinión del ieee, 33. (https://cutt.ly/t1euyag).
• Frías, c. (2022, 12 de julio). ucrania y el ejército ruso: primeras impresiones (ii). documento de opinión del ieee, 71. (https://cutt.ly/m1eu0t0).
• Galeotti, m. (2022, 23 de abril). the interfering tsar: Why Putin is ukraine’s Best Hope of victory. the times. (https://cutt.ly/PmvZyi3). gerasimov, v. (2013, 26 de febrero). tsennost' nauki – v predvidenii: novyye vyzovy trebuyut pereosmysleniya form i sposobov vedeniya boyevykh deystviy. voyenno-Promyshlennyy Kurier. (https://cutt.ly/um5kwfr). goldberg, j. (2016, 15 de abril). the obama doctrine. the atlantic. (https://cutt.ly/ymvHouP). götz, e.; staun, j. (2022). Why russia attacked ukraine: strategic culture and radicalized narratives. contemporary security Policy, 43(3), 482-497. doi:10.1080/13523260.2022.208263.
• Gould-davies, n. (2022). Putin’s strategic Failure. survival, 64(2), 7-16. doi:10.1080/00396338.2022.2055818. grau, l.; Bartles, c. (2016). the russian Way of War: Force structure, tactics, and modernization of the russian ground Forces. Fort leavenworth (estados unidos): Foreign military studies office. (https://cutt.ly/umvdieZ). grau, l.; Bartles, c. (2018). the russian reconnaissance Fire complex comes of age. oxford (reino unido): changing character of War centre. (https://cutt.ly/lmvnqHd).
• Grau, l.; Bartles, c. (2022, 14 de abril). getting to Know the russian Battalion tactical group. commentary rusi. (https://cutt.ly/2mnm7nu).
• Hagström-Frisell, e.; Pallin, K. (eds.) (2021). Western military capability in northern europe. collective defence. estocolmo (suecia): Foi. (https://cutt.ly/9mvHttm).
• Jonsson, m.; dalsjö, r. (eds.) (2020). Beyond Bursting Bubbles: understanding the Full spectrum of the russian a2/ ad threat and identifying strategies for counteraction. estocolmo (suecia): Foi. (https://cutt.ly/qmvvuqn).
• Khodarenok, m. (2022, 3 de febrero). Prognozy krovožadnyh politologov. nezavisimaâ gazeta. (https://cutt.ly/ZmvlvrQ).
• Kipp, j. (2012). russian sixth generation Warfare and recent developments. eurasia daily monitor, 9(17). (https://cutt.ly/1mvdlyf).
• Kofman, m. (2021). russian military strategy: core tenets and operational concepts. alexandria (estados unidos): center for naval analyses. (https://cutt.ly/jmvbX2g).
• Kofman, m.; edmonds, j. (2022, 22 de febrero). russia’s shock and awe: moscow’s use of overwhelming Force against ukraine. Foreign affairs. (https://cutt.ly/nmvZgac).
• Kofman, m.; lee, r. (2022, 2 de junio). not built for purpose: the russian military’s ill-fated force design. War on the rocks. (https://cutt.ly/7mvFwqH).
• Mahnken, t.; sharp, t.; Kim, g. (2020). deterrence by detection: a Key role for unmanned aircraft systems in great Power competition. Washington dc (estados unidos): center for strategic and Budgetary assessments. (https://cutt.ly/v1w4g9h). mcdermott, r. (2017). russia’s electronic Warfare capabilities to 2025: challenging nato in the electromagnetic spectrum. tallinn (estonia): international centre for defence and security. (https://cutt.ly/PmvHuuu).
• Mcdermott, r. (2021a, 29 de mayo). russia’s entry to sixth-generation Warfare: the ‘non-contact’ experiment in syria. jamestown. (https://cutt.ly/1mvF2vn).
• Mcdermott, r. (2021b, 29 de octubre). russian military thought on the changing character of War: Harnessing technology in the information age. jamestown. (https://cutt.ly/vmvs2Ht).
• Mearsheimer, j. (2014). Why the ukraine crisis is the West’s fault. Foreign affairs, 93(5), 77-89. (https://cutt.ly/amHcn4Q).
• Mearsheimer, j. (2001). the tragedy of great Power Politics. nueva york (estados unidos): W.W. norton. microsoft (2022a, 27 de abril). special report: ukraine. an overview of russia’s cyberattack activity in ukraine. (https://cutt.ly/dmvZHeZ). microsoft (2022, 22 de junio). defending ukraine: early lessons from the cyber War. (https://cutt.ly/emHs7gt).
• Morris, l.; mazarr, m.; Hornung, j.; Pezard, s.; Binnendijk, a.; Kepe, m. (2019). gaining competitive advantage in the gray Zone: response options for coercive aggression Below the threshold of major War. santa monica (estados unidos): rand corporation. (https://cutt.ly/tmvgusw).
• Nardelli, r.; jacobs, j. (2021, 21 de noviembre). u.s. intel shows russia Plans for Potential ukraine invasion. Bloomberg. (https://cutt.ly/xm5aKn8).
• Norberg, j.; dalsjö, r. (2022). Why we got russia wrong. in j. lundén, g. Bergström, P. Bull, j. Henningsson, j. norberg, P. stenumgaard & a. Waleij (eds.), another rude awakening. making sense of russia’s war against ukraine (pp. 19-24). estocolmo (suecia): Foi.
• Norberg, j.; simpson, n. (2021). ZaPad 2021 and russia’s Potential for Warfighting. Pensilvania (estados unidos): Foreign Policy research institute. (https://cutt.ly/amvgl81).
• Oxenstierna, s.; Westerlund, F.; Persson, g.; Kjellén, j.; dahlqvist, n.; goliath, m.; Hedenskog, j.; malmlöf, t.; engvall, j. (2019). russian military capability in a ten-year Perspective – 2019. estocolmo (suecia): Foi. (https://cutt.ly/3mnbrtb).
• Pettyjohn, s.; Wasser, B. (2019). competing in the gray Zone. russian tactics and Western responses. santa monica (estados unidos): rand corporation. (https://cutt.ly/bmvgc9P).
• Pulido, g. (2021). guerra multidominio y mosaico: el nuevo pensamiento militar estadounidense. madrid (españa): catarata. reuters (2022, 10 de enero). ukraine says arrests russian agent planning attacks in odessa. (https://cutt.ly/F1wlznz).
• Schweller, r. (1994). Bandwagoning for Profit: Bringing the revisionist state Back in. international security, 19(1), 72-107. doi:10.2307/2539149.
• Schwirtz, m. (2021, 9 de diciembre). ukraine commanders say a russian invasion Would overwhelm them. new york times. (https://cutt.ly/vmnxsuf).
• Slipchenko, v. (2004). voina novogo pokoleniia: distantsionnye i beskontaktaktnye. moscú (Federación rusa): olma-Press. sonne, P.; Khurshudyan, i; morgunov, s.; Khudov, K. (2022, 24 de agosto). Battle for Kyiv: ukranian valor, russian blunders combined to save the capital. the Washington Post. (https://acortar.link/o5tHhh).
• Tass (2022a, 26 de febrero). Zelensky hastily fled Kiev, russian state duma speaker claims. (https://cutt.ly/d1w2Hgw).
• Tass (2022b, 19 de abril). russia begins another stage of special military operation in ukraine, says lavrov. (https://cutt.ly/dmKmefH).
• Thomas, t, (2016). the evolution of russian military thought: integrating Hybrid, new-generation, and new-type thinking. the journal of slavic military studies, 29(4), 554-575. doi:10.1080/13518046.2016.1232541.
• Troianovski, a; schwirtz, m.; Kramer, a. (2022, 27 de enero). russia’s military, once creaky, is modern and lethal. new york times. (https://cutt.ly/imnxQd7).
• Villanueva, c. (2022). crónica de un fracaso estratégico. in g. colom-Piella (ed.), la guerra de ucrania: los 100 días que cambiaron europa (pp. 37-64). madrid (españa): catarata-ejércitos.
• Watling, j.; reynolds, n. (2022). operation Z. the death throes of an imperial delusion. londres (reino unido): royal united services institute. (https://cutt.ly/8mvZPwj).
• Watts, B. (2013). the evolution of Precision strike. Washington dc (estados unidos): center for strategic and Budgetary assessments. (https://cutt.ly/ymvsKds).
• Zabrodskyi, m.; Watling, j.; danylyuk, o.; reynolds, n. (2022). Preliminary lessons in conventional Warfighting from russia’s invasion of ukraine: February-july 2022. londres (reino unido): royal united services institute. (https://cutt.ly/H1oKgl).