La protección de los derechos digitalesUna cuestión identitaria europea

  1. Lazari, Antonio 1
  1. 1 Universidad Pablo de Olavide
    info

    Universidad Pablo de Olavide

    Sevilla, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02z749649

Revista:
Cuadernos de derecho transnacional

ISSN: 1989-4570

Any de publicació: 2024

Volum: 16

Número: 1

Pàgines: 295-318

Tipus: Article

DOI: 10.20318/CDT.2024.8425 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAccés obert editor

Altres publicacions en: Cuadernos de derecho transnacional

Resum

El almacenamiento de datos personales no pone en peligro solo el denominado derecho individual a la privacidad, sino que afecta a un espectro social y político más amplio, relacionado con la salud de la vida democrática. Frente a la visión soberanista china y a la idea segmentada y mercantilista estadounidense de seguridad digital, la Unión Europea va proponiendo en esta última década una concepción estrechamente ligada a la jurisprudencia del TJUE en torno a la esencia del derecho fundamental a la identidad digital. Este estudio aborda los aspectos esenciales de la protección de datos en la nueva globalización, diseñando un cuadro estratégico donde tanto dentro del territorio de la Unión como fuera de ello las instituciones comunitarias han de dialogar necesariamente sobre el alcance de los derechos fundamentales.

Referències bibliogràfiques

  • J. Gray, The New Leviathans: Thoughts After Liberalism, Penguin Books Ltd., 2023
  • A. Lazari, De ciberataques y ciberleviatanes: cartografía de la “governance” en el prisma del derecho europeo y comparado, en Ciberataques y ciberseguridad en la escena internacional, coord. por L. Millán Moro, 2019
  • A. Lazari, “La protezione reticolare europea dei diritti digitali nello scenario internazionale” (Iª Parte), Studi sull’integrazione europea, XVII (2022)
  • A. Lazari, “La protezione reticolare europea dei diritti digitali nello scenario internazionale” (IIª Parte), Studi sull’integrazione europea, XVII, 2022
  • D. W. Samuel y L. D. Brandeis, “The Right to Privacy”, Harvard Law Review 4, 1890
  • R. Sacco, “Legal Formants: A Dynamic Approach to Comparative Law (Installment I of II), The American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 39, No. 1 (Winter, 1991)
  • J. Fischer, “The Challenges and Opportunities for a US Federal Privacy Law”, en F. Fabbrini, E. Celeste y J. Quinn (eds.), Data Protection Beyond Borders: Transatlantic Perspectives on Extraterritoriality and Sovereignty, Hart Publishing, 2021
  • Whitman, James Q., “The Two Western Cultures of Privacy: Dignity versus Liberty”, Yale Law Journal, 2017
  • R. Moshell, “And Then There Was One: The Outlook for a Self-Regulatory United States Amidst a Global Trend Toward Comprehensive Data Protection”, Texas Technology Law Review, 2005
  • S.W. Smith, “Clouds on the Horizon: Cross-Border Surveillance Under the US CLOUD Act”, en F. Fabbrini, E. Celeste y J. Quinn (eds.), Data Protection Beyond Borders: Transatlantic Perspectives on Extraterritoriality and Sovereignty, Hart Publishing, 2021
  • L. Lessig, Code: And Other Laws of Cyberspace, Version 2.0, Nueva York, 2006
  • E. Pernot-Leplay, “China’s Approach on Data Privacy Law: A Third Way Between the U.S. and the E.U.?”, Penn State Journal of Law and International Affaires, 2020
  • WANG YUAN, Xin Qiang, “Internet Sovereignty, an Inevitable Issue”, People’s Daily, 23rd ed., 23/4/2014
  • Z. Weiwei, The China Wave: Rise of a Civilizational State, New Jersey
  • R. Vatanparast, “Data Governance and the Elasticity of Sovereignty”, Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 2020
  • S. Tiezzi, Xi Jinping Leads China’s New Internet Security Group”, The Diplomat, 28 febrero 2014
  • Y. Wu, T. Lau, D. Atkin, C.A. Lin, “A Comparative Study of Online Privacy Regulations in the U.S. and China”, Telecommunications Policy, 2019
  • K. Cai, “Jurisdictional Report: People’s Republic of China in Regulation of Cross -Border Tran sfers of Personal Data in Asia”, en GIROT Clarisse (ed.), Regulation of Cross-Border Transfers of Personal Data in Asia (editor) Asian Business Law Institute, 2018, p
  • C. Qiheng Chen, L. Shi, A. Mingli y K. Neville, “Translation: New Draft Rules on Cross-Border Transfer of Personal Information Out of China”, New America, 13 junio 2019
  • Cfr. SHACKELFORD Scott - ALEXANDER, Frank, “China’s Cyber Sovereignty: Paper Tiger or Rising Dragon?”, Asia & the Pacific Policy Society (18 de enero de 2018)
  • L. De Nardis, G. Goldstein, Y D. A. Gross, “The Rising Geopolitics of Internet Governance: Cyber Sovereignty v. Distributed Governance”, Paper presentado al Columbia SIPSTech & Policy Initiative, Columbia SIPA November 2016
  • Wagner, Daniel, “What China’s Cybersecurity Law says about the future”, Sunday Guardian, 11 mayo 2019
  • J.E. Cohen, “Between Truth and Power: The Legal Constructions of Informational Capitalism”, International Journal of Communication, 2019
  • A. Qi, G. Shao, y W. Zheng, “Assessing China’s Cybersecurity Law”, Computer Law & Security Review, 2018
  • D. Clementi, “La legge cinese sulla protezione delle informazioni personali: un GDPR con caratteristiche cinesi?”, Diritti comparati, 2022
  • J.M. Lassalle, Ciberleviatán. El colapso de la democracia liberal frente a la revolución digital, Barcelona, 2019
  • M. Dunn Cavelty, F. Egloff, “The Politics of Cybersecurity: Balancing Different Roles of the State”, St Antony’s International Review 15 no.1, 2019
  • S. Zuboff, “Big Other: Surveillance Capitalism and the Prospects of an Information Civilization”, Journal of Information Technology, 2015
  • S. Zuboff, “Surveillance Capitalism or Democracy? The Death Match of Institutional Orders and the Politics of Knowledge in Our Information Civilization” Organization Theory, (3), 2022
  • A. Moreno Bobadilla, I. Serrano Maíllo (eds.), El derecho a la protección de datos personales en Europa y en América: diferentes visiones para una misma realidad, Tirant lo Blanch, Valencia, 2021
  • H. Jonas, The Imperative of Responsibility. In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age, University of Chicago Press, 1984
  • S. Rodotà, Il diritto di avere diritti, Laterza, Bari, 2012
  • L. Floridi, “The Fight for Digital Sovereignty: What It Is, and Why It Matters, Especially for the EU”, Philosophy & Technology, 33(3), 2020
  • A.M. Roomkin, “The Internet as a Source of Regulatory Arbitrage”, en B. Kahin, C. Nesson (eds.) Borders in Cyberspace, 1999
  • A.N. Guiora, Cybersecurity Geopolitics, Law, and Policy, New York, 2017
  • A. López, “Ciberseguridad en los Estados”, Revista de Occidente, Nº 456, 2019 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Ciberseguridad: El reto del siglo XXI)
  • G. De Gregorio, Digital Constitutionalism in Europe. Reframing Rights and Powers in the Algorithmic Society, Cambridge University Press, 2022
  • C. Kuner, “The Internet and the Global Reach of EU Law”, en (CREMONA, Marise y SCOTT, Joanne eds.,) EU Law Beyond EU Borders: The Extraterritorial Reach of EU Law, 2019
  • G. De Gregorio, “The rise of digital constitutionalism in the European Union”, Int. Const. Law Review Vol. 19 No. 1, 2021
  • O. Pollicino, “Judicial Protection of Fundamental Rights in the Transition from the World of Atoms to the Word of Bits: The Case of Freedom of Speech”, 25 Eur. L.J. 155, 2019
  • A. Lazari, “La cuestión de la identidad en el derecho internacional, europeo y comparado: por una visión relacional del Derecho”, Rev. Esp. Der. Eur., 2022
  • J. Weiler, The Constitution of Europe. ‘Do the New Clothes Have an Emperor Harvard University Press, 1999
  • V. Mitsilegas, E. Guild, E. Kuskonmaz, N. Vav oula, “Data Retention and the Future of Large-Scale Surveillance: The Evolution and Contestation of Judicial Benchmarks”, Eur Law J. 2022
  • A. Lazari, La cross-fertilisation y la formación del paradigma comunitario de responsabilidad del Estado: «el esquema de la crisis», in Revista de Derecho Comunitario Europeo, enero-abril (2005)
  • A. Lazari, La Nueva Gramática Del Constitucionalismo Judicial Europeo, en Revista de Derecho Comunitario Europeo mayo/agosto (2009)
  • N. Perlo, “La decisione del Consiglio di Stato francese sulla Data retention: come conciliare l’inconciliabile”, Diritti Comparati N. 2/2021
  • F. Bignami, “Schrems II: The Right to Privacy and the New Illiberalism”, Verfassungsblog (29 de julio de 2020)
  • S. Seubert y C. Becker, “The Democratic Impact of Strengthening European Fundamental Rights in the Digital Age: The Example of Privacy Protection”, German Law Journal 22, 2021
  • L. Floridi, “Trump, Parler, and Regulating the Infosphere as our Commons”, Philosophy and Technology 34 (1), 2021
  • I. Schuliaquer, ¿Can Twitter and Facebook Censor Trump in the Name of Democracy?, OpenDemocracy, 13 de enero 2021
  • M. Cartabia, “Editorial: Courts’ Relations”, I•CON 18 (2020)
  • K. Irion, “Schrems II and Surveillance: Third Countries’ National Security Powers in the Purview of EU Law”, EU Law Blog (24 de julio de 2020)
  • M.H. Murphy, “Assessing the Implications of Schrems II for EU-US Data Flow”, ICLQ, 2020
  • H.P. Glenn, The Cosmopolitan State, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2013
  • H. Dedek (ed.), A Cosmopolitan Jurisprudence: Essays in Memory of H. Patrick Glenn, ASCL Studies in Comparative Law, Cambridge, 2021
  • C. Gentile, “La saga Schrems e la tutela dei diritti fondamentali”, Federalismi, 2021
  • J.P. Meltzer, “The Court of Justice of the European Union in Schrems II: The impact of GDPR on Data Flows and National Security”, VoxEu, 5.8.2020
  • R. Bifulco, “Il trasferimento dei dati personali nella sentenza Schrems II: dal contenuto essenziale al principio di proporzionalità e ritorno, DPER online, 2/2020
  • M. Tzanou, Schrems I y Schrems II: assessing the case for the extraterritoriality of EU fundamental rights, en F. Fabbrini, E. Celeste, J. Quinn (eds.), Data Protection Beyond Borders Transatlantic Perspectives On Extraterritoriality And Sovereignty, Hart Publishing, 2021
  • O. Pollicino, “La tutela de la privacy digital: el diálogo entre el Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea y las jurisdicciones nacionales”, Revista de Estudios Políticos, 2016
  • A. Bradford, The Brussel Effect. How the European Union Rules the World, Oxford, 2020
  • O. Pollicino, “Judicial Protection of Fundamental Rights on the Internet. A Road Towards Digital Constitutionalism?”, Hart, 2021
  • O. Pollicino, “Data Protection Beyond Borders Transatlantic Perspectives on Extraterritoriality and Sovereignty”, en F. Fabbrini, E. Celeste, J. Quinn (eds.), op. cit., Hart, 2021
  • E. Fahey, “Does the EU’s Digital Sovereignty Promote Localisation in Its Model Digital Trade Clauses?”, European Papers, Vol. 8, 2023
  • J. Habermas, Technology and Science as ‘Ideology, trad. Jeremy J. Shapiro, Beacon Press, Boston, 1970
  • L. Floridi, “The Fight for Digital Sovereignty: What It Is, and Why It Matters, Especially for the EU”, Philosophy & Technology, 33(3), 2021
  • H. Byung-Chul, Las no-cosas. Quiebras del mundo de hoy, Taurus, 2021
  • J. Goldsmith y T. Wu, Who Controls The Internet?: Illusions Of A Borderless World, 2006
  • E.J. Cohen, “Cyberspace As/And Space”, 107 Colum. L. Rev., 2007
  • H. Roberts, J. Cowls, F. Casolari, J. Morley, M. Taddeo y L. Florido, “Safeguarding European values with digital sovereignty: an analysis of statements and policies”, Internet Policy Review, 10, 2021
  • N. Suzor, Lawless: The Secret Rules that Govern our Digital Lives, London, 2019
  • R. Vatanparast, “Data Governance and the Elasticity of Sovereignty”, Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 2020
  • P. Schwartz, “Global Data Privacy: The EU Way”, NYU Law Review, 2019
  • L. Bygrave, Data Privacy Law: An International Perspective, Oxford, 2014
  • G. González Fuster, “The Right to the Protection of Personal Data and EU Law”, en G. González Fuster (ed.), The Emergence of Personal Data Protection as a Fundamental Right of the EU, 2014, London
  • O. Lynskey, “The ‘Europeanisation’ of Data Protection Law”, Cambridge Yearbook of European Law Studies 252, 2017
  • E. Parisier, El filtro burbuja. Cómo la web decide lo que leemos y lo que pensamos, Taurus, 2013
  • E. Díaz Álvarez, La palabra que aparece. El testimonio como acto de supervivencia, 2021
  • I. Calvino, Le città invisibili, Milano, 2016