The relationships of family and classroom environments with peer relational victimizationan analysis of their gender differences

  1. Cava Caballero, María Jesús 1
  2. Musitu Ochoa, Gonzalo 2
  3. Buelga Vázquez, Sofía 1
  4. Murgui Pérez, Sergio 3
  1. 1 Universitat de València
    info

    Universitat de València

    Valencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/043nxc105

  2. 2 Universidad Pablo de Olavide
    info

    Universidad Pablo de Olavide

    Sevilla, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02z749649

  3. 3 Universidad Católica de Valencia San Vicente Mártir
    info

    Universidad Católica de Valencia San Vicente Mártir

    Valencia, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03d7a9c68

Mostrar afiliaciones +
Revista:
The Spanish Journal of Psychology

ISSN: 1138-7416

Año de publicación: 2010

Volumen: 13

Número: 1

Páginas: 156-165

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1017/S1138741600003747 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: The Spanish Journal of Psychology

Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible

Resumen

Este estudio analiza las relaciones entre las percepciones que los adolescentes tienen de su clima familiar y escolar y la victimización relacional entre iguales, teniendo en cuenta que estas relaciones pueden estar mediadas por la autoestima, los sentimientos de soledad y el estatus sociométrico de los adolescentes. Estas relaciones, y sus posibles diferencias de género, fueron analizadas en una muestra de 1319 adolescentes españoles (48% chicos y 52% chicas) con edades comprendidas entre los 11 y los 16 años (M = 13.7, DT = 1.5). Un mismo modelo de ecuaciones estructurales fue calculado de forma separada para chicos y chicas. Los resultados sugirieron efectos directos significativos de la autoestima, la soledad y el estatus sociométrico de los adolescentes en la victimización relacional para los chicos, y de la soledad y el estatus sociométrico para las chicas. Las percepciones de los adolescentes del clima familiar y del clima escolar mostraron efectos indirectos significativos en la victimización relacional para chicos y chicas, pero las trayectorias eran diferentes. En general, los resultados sugirieron que para los chicos un clima escolar negativo tenía un efecto más relevante en la victimización relacional.

€ Ver financiación

Información de financiación

This investigation was supported by Ministry of Science and Innovation of Spain Research Grant PSI2008-01535/PSIC: “Violence at School, Victimization and Social Reputation in Adolescence”.

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Archer, J. & Cote, S. (2005). Sex differences in aggressive behavior: A developmental and evolutionary perspective. In Tremplay RE, Hartup, WW, Archer, J. (Eds.), Developmental origins of aggression. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 425-443.
  • Archer, J. & Coyne, S. M. (2005). An integrated review of indirect, relational, and social aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9(3), 212-230. (Pubitemid 41355519)
  • Baños, R., & Guillen, V. (2000). Psychometric characteristics in normal and social phobic samples for a Spanish version of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Psychological Reports, 87(1), 269-274.
  • Barth, J. M., Dunlap, S. T., Dane, H., Lochman, J. E., & Wells, K. C. (2004). Classroom environment influences on aggression, peer relations, and academic focus. Journal of School Psychology, 42, 115-133. (Pubitemid 38393949)
  • Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
  • Blum, J., Ireland, M., & Blum, R. W. (2003). Gender differences in juvenile violence. Journal of Adolescent Health, 32, 234-240.
  • Boivin, M., Hymel, S., & Bukowski, W M. (1995). The roles of social withdrawal, peer rejection, and victimization by peers in predicting loneliness and depressed mood in children. Development and Psychopathology, 7, 765-786.
  • Boulton, M. J. (1999) Concurrent and longitudinal relations between children's playground behavior and social preference, victimization, and bullying. Child Development, 70, 944-954.
  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977) Toward an ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32, 513-531.
  • Card, N. A., Stucky, B. D., Sawalani, G. M., & Little, T. D. (2008). Direct and indirect aggression during childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustment. Child Development, 79(5), 1185-1229.
  • Cava, M. J., & Musitu, G. (1999). La integración escolar: un análisis en función del sexo y el curso académico de los alumnos. Revista Española de Orientación y Psicopedagogía. 10(18), 297-314.
  • Cava, M. J., Musitu, G., & Murgui, S. (2007). Individual and social risk factors related to overt victimization in a sample of Spanish adolescents. Psychological Reports, 101, 275-290.
  • Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A., & Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: a cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18(4), 557-570.
  • Crick, N. R., & Bigbee, M. A. (1998). Relational and overt forms of peer victimization: A multi-informant approach. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 337-347.
  • Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66, 710-722.
  • Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1996). Children's treatment by peers: Victims of relational and overt aggression. Development and Psychopathology, 8, 367-380.
  • Crick, N. R., Casas, J. F., & Nelson, D. A. (2002). Toward a more comprehensive understanding of peer maltreatment: Studies of relational victimization. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(3), 98-101.
  • Darling, N. & Steinberg, L. (1993). Parenting style as context: An integrative model. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 487-496.
  • Del Rey, R. & Ortega, R. (2008). Bullying in poor countries: Prevalence and coexistence with other forms of violence. International Journal of Psycholgy and Psychological Therapy, 8(1), 39-50.
  • Demaray, M. P. & Malecki, C. K. (2002). The relationship between perceived social support and maladjustment for students at risk. Psychology in the Schools, 39, 305-316.
  • Dempsey, J. P., Fireman, G. D., & Wang, E. (2006). Transitioning out of peer victimization in school children: Gender and behavioral characteristics. Journal of Psychopathology and behavioral assessment, 28(4), 273-282.
  • Dodge, K. A. & Feldman, E. (1990). Issues in social cognition and sociometric status. In S. R. Asher & J. D. Coie (Eds.), Peer rejection in childhood. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Echeburua, E. (1995). Manual práctico de evaluación y tratamiento de la fobia social. Barcelona: Martínez Roca.
  • Egan, S. K., & Perry, D. G. (1998). Does low self-regard invite victimization? Developmental Psychology, 34(2), 299-309.
  • Eslea, M., Menesini, E., Morita, Y., O'Moore, M., MoraMerchan, J. A., Pereira, B., & Smith, P. K. (2004). Friendship and loneliness among bullies and victims: data from seven countries. Aggressive Behavior, 30(1), 71-83. (Pubitemid 38651825)
  • Estevez, E., Emler, N., & Musitu, G. (2007). Adjustment problems in the family and school contexts, attitude towards authority and violent behaviour at school in adolescence. Adolescence, 42, 779-794.
  • Estevez, E., Murgui, S., Musitu, G. & Moreno, D. (2008). Adolescent aggression: Effects of gender and family school environment. Journal of Adolescence, 31, 433-450.
  • Exposito, F., & Moya, M. C. (1999). Soledad y apoyo social. Revista de Psicologia Social, 2-3, 319-339.
  • Fernández-Ballesteros, R., & Sierra, B. ( 1989). Escalas de Clima Social FES, WES, CIESy CES. Madrid: TEA.
  • Fox, C. L., & Boulton, M. J. (2006). Frienship as a moderator of the relationship between social skills problems and peer victimization. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 110-121.
  • Garandeau, C. F., & Cillesen, A. H. N. (2006). From indirect aggression to invisible aggression: A conceptual view on bullying and peer group manipulation. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11, 612-625. (Pubitemid 44486867)
  • Gázquez, J. J., Cangas, A. J., Pérez, M. C., & Lucas, F. (2008). Comparative analysis of the perception of school violence in teachers, pupils, and families. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 11(2), 443-452.
  • Ge, X., Conger, R. D., & Elder, G. H. (1996). Coming of age too early: Pubertal influences on girls' vulnerability to psychological distress. Child Development, 67, 3386-3400. (Pubitemid 126416782)
  • Gini, G., Albiero, P., Benelli, B., & Altoè, G. (2008). Determinants of adolescents' active defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying. Journal of Adolescence, 31, 93-105.
  • Hartshorne, T. S. (1993). Psychometric properties and confirmatory factor-analysis of the UCLA Loneliness Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 61, 182-195.
  • Hawker, D. S. J. & Boulton, M. J. (2000). Twenty years' research on peer victimization and psychosocial maladjustment: a meta-analytic review of cross-sectional studies. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41, 441-455.
  • Hodges, E. V. E., & Perry, D. G. (1999). Personal and interpersonal antecedents and consequences of victimization by peers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 677-685.
  • Hodges, E. V. E., Malone, M. J., & Perry, D. G. (1997). Individual risk and social risk as interacting determinants of victimization in the peer group. Developmental Psychology, 33, 1032-1039.
  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling 6, 1-55.
  • Jiang, X. L., & Cillesen, A. H. N. (2005). Stability of continuous measures of sociometric status: a meta-analysis. Developmental Review, 25(1), 1-25.
  • Johnson, H. D., La Voie, J. C., & Mahoney, M. (2001 ). Interparental conflict and family cohesion predictors of loneliness, social anxiety, and social avoidance in late adolescence. Journal of Adolescent Research, 16(3), 304-318.
  • Johnson, H. D., LaVoie, J. C., Spenceri, M. C., & MahoneyWernli, M. A. (2001). Peer conflict avoidance: associations with loneliness, social anxiety, and social avoidance. Psychological Reports, 88, 227-235.
  • Ladd, G. W., & Troop-Gordon, W. (2003) The role of chronic peer difficulties in the development of children's psychological adjustment problems. Child Development, 74(5), 1344-1367.
  • Larose, S., & Boivin, M. (1998). Attachment to parents, social support expectations, and socioemotional adjustment during the high school-college transition. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 8(1), 1-27. (Pubitemid 128659224)
  • Lewin, K. (1936) Principles of topological psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Lucia, V. C., & Breslau, N. (2006). Family cohesion and children's behavior problems: a longitudinal investigation. Psychiatry Research, 141(2), 141-149.
  • Maccoby, E. E. & Martin, J. A. (1983). Socialization in the context of the family: parent-child interaction. In Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 1-101), Mussen, P.H. (Ed.). New York: Wiley.
  • Martin, K. M. & Huebner, E. S. (2007). Peer victimization and prosocial experiences and emotional well-being of middle school students. Psychology in the Schools, 44(2), 199-207.
  • Marturano, E. M., Ferrerira, M. D. T., & Bacarji, K. M. G. (2005) An evalution scale of family environment for identification of children at risk of school failure. Psychological Reports, 96(2), 307-321.
  • Meece, J. L., Anderman, E. M., & Anderman, L. H. (2006) Classroom goal structure, student motivation, and academic achievement. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 487-503.
  • Moos, R. H., & Moos, B. S. (1981). Family Environment Scale manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.
  • Moos, R. H., & Trickett, E. J. (1973). Classroom Environment Scale manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.
  • Musitu, G., Buelga, S., Lila, M., & Cava, M. J. (2001). Familiay adolescencia. Madrid: Síntesis.
  • Musitu, G. & Garcia, F. (2004). Consecuencias de la socialización familiar en la cultura española. Psicothema, 16(2), 288-293. (Pubitemid 41310407)
  • Mynard, H., & Joseph, S. (2000). Development of the multidimensional peer-victimization scale. Aggressive Behavior, 26, 169-178.
  • Pastor, Y., Balaguer, I., & García-Mérita, M. L. (2003). El autoconcepto y la autoestima en la adolescencia media: análisis diferencial por curso y género. Revista de Psicología Social, 18(2), 141-159.
  • Pellegrini, A.D., Bartini, M., & Brooks, F. (1999). School bullies, victims, and aggressive victims: Factors relating to group affiliation and victimization in early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 216-224.
  • Pierce, G. R., Sarason, I. G., & Sarason, B. R. (1991). General and relationship-based perceptions of social support -are 2 constructs better than one. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(6), 1028-1039.
  • Prinstein, M. J., Boergers, J. & Vernberg, E. M. (2001). Overt and relational aggression in adolescents: Social-pychological adjustment of aggressors and victims. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 30, 479-491. (Pubitemid 33658637)
  • Putallaz, M., Grimes, C. L., Foster, K. J., Kupersmidt, J. B., Coie, J. D., & Dealing, K. (2007). Overt and relational aggression and victimization: Multiple perspectives within school setting. Journal of School Psychology, 45(5), 523-547.
  • Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univer. Press.
  • Russell, D. W. (1996). UCLA Loneliness scale (version 3): reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 20-40.
  • Salmivalli, C., & Isaacs, J. (2005). Prospective relations among victimization, rejection, friendlessness, and children's selfand peer-perceptions. Child Development, 76(6), 1161-1171. (Pubitemid 41698968)
  • Schwartz, D., Gorman, A. H., Nakamoto, J., & Toblin, R. L. (2005). Victimization in the peer group and children's academic functioning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(3), 425-435. (Pubitemid 41426392)
  • Storch, E. A. & Masia-Warner, C. (2004). The relationship of peer victimization to social anxiety and loneliness in adolescent females. Journal of Adolescence, 27, 351-362.
  • Terry, R. (2000). Recent advances in measurement theory and the use of sociometric techniques. In A. H. N Cillesen & W. M. Bukowski (Eds.), Recent advances in the measurment of acceptance and rejection in the peer system. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Pp.75-93.
  • Underwood, M. (2003). Social aggression among girls. New York: Guilford Press.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet