La incidencia del capital humano y la cultura emprendedora en la innovación

  1. Pizarro Moreno, María Isabel
  2. Real, Juan C.
  3. Rosa Navarro, Dolores de la
Revista:
Cuadernos de economía y dirección de la empresa

ISSN: 1138-5758

Año de publicación: 2011

Volumen: 14

Número: 3

Páginas: 139-150

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1016/J.CEDE.2010.09.001 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Cuadernos de economía y dirección de la empresa

Resumen

El objetivo de este estudio es analizar el efecto que desempeñan la cultura emprendedora de la organización y el valor y la especificidad de los conocimientos de los individuos (capital humano) sobre la innovación. Para ello se trabaja con una muestra de empresas en los sectores más innovadores españoles, aplicando la técnica Partial Least Squares (PLS). Los resultados ponen de manifiesto relaciones significativas entre el valor y la especificidad de los conocimientos de los individuos y la innovación de la empresa. La cultura emprendedora se convierte en una variable moderadora, de modo que la influencia del valor de los conocimientos de los trabajadores sobre la innovación es mayor en presencia de la misma.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Akgün, A.E., Kesbin, H., Byrne, J.C., Aren, S., 2007. Emotional and learning capability and their impact on product innovativeness and firm performance. Technovation 9 (27), 501-513.
  • Alegre, J., Lapiedra, R., Chiva, R., 2006. A measurement scale for product innovation performance. European Journal of Innovation Management 9 (4), 333-346.
  • Allen, T., 1977. Managing the flow of technology: Technology transfer and the dissemination of technological information within the R&D organization. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • Anderson, N., King, N., 1993. Innovation in organizations. In: Cooper, C.L., Robertson, I.T. (Eds.), international review of industrial and organizational psychology. Wiley, Nueva York, pp. 1-34.
  • Armstrong, J.S., Overton, T.S., 1977. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research 14 (3), 396-402.
  • Avlonitis, G.J., Papastathopoulou, P.G., Gounaris, S.P., 2001. An empirically-based typology of product innovativeness for new financial services: Success and failure scenarios. The Journal of Product Innovation Management 18 (5), 324-342.
  • Barclay, D., Higgins, C., Thompson, R., 1995. The partial least squares (PLS) approach to causal modelling: Personal computer adoption and use as illustration. Technological Studies, Special Issue on Research Methodology 2 (2), 285-309.
  • Barney, J., 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17 (1), 99-120.
  • Beer, M., Eisenhart, R., Spector, B., 1990. The critical path to corporate renewal. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
  • Booz, Allen, Hamilton, 1982. Management of new products management for the 1980s. Booz, Allen and Hamilton, Inc, New York.
  • Cabrera, E.F., Bonache, J., 1999. An expert HR system for aligning organizational culture and strategy. Human Resource Planning 22 (1), 51-60.
  • Cameron, K., Quinn, R., 1999. Diagnosing and changing organizational culture: Based on the competing values framework. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
  • Capon, N., Farley, J.U., Lehmann, D.R., Hulbert, J.M., 1992. Profiles of product innovators among large U.S. manufacturers. Management Science 38 (2), 157-169.
  • Carmines, E.G., Zeller, R.A., 1979. Reliability and validity assessment. In: in Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences (07-017). Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
  • Chandler, N.G., Keller, C., Lyon, W.D., 2000. Unravelling the determinants and consequences of an innovation- supportive organizational culture. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 25 (1), 59-80.
  • Chin, W.W., 1998a. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In: Marcoulides, G.A. (Ed.), modern methods for business research. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 295-336.
  • Chin, W.W., 1998b. Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly 22, vii-xv.
  • Chin, W.W., Frye, T., 2003. PLS-Graph, Version 3.00 (Build 1017). University of Houston.
  • Chin, W.W., Gopal, A., 1995. Adoption intention in GSS: Relative importance of beliefs. The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems 26 (2, 3), 42-63.
  • Chin, W.W., Marcolin, B.L., Newsted, P.R., 2003. A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research 14 (2), 189-217.
  • Churchill Jr., G.A., 1979. A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research XVI (1), 64-73.
  • Cohen, W.M., Levinthal, D.A., 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (1), 128-152.
  • Cooper, R.G., 2001. Winning at new products: Accelerating the process from idea to launch. Perseus Books, Cambridge, MA.
  • Covin, J., Slevin, D., 1990.Newventure strategic posture, structure and performance: An industry life cycle analysis. Journal of Business Venturing 5 (2), 123-135.
  • Crozier, M., Friedberg, E., 1977. L'acteur et el systeme. Le Seuil, Paris.
  • Cycyota, C.S., Harrison, D.A., 2002. Enhancing survey response rates at the executive level. Journal of Management 28 (2), 151-176.
  • Damanpour, F., 1991. Organizational innovation: Ameta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal 34 (3), 555-590.
  • Darroch, J., Jardine, A., 2002 October 25-27. Combining firm-based and consumerbased perspectives to develop a new measure for innovation. In: 3rd International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology, Hangzhou City, China.
  • Dastmalchian, A., Sango, L., Ignace, N., 2000 April. The Interplay between organizational cultures: acomparison of organizational practices in Canada, South Korea using the Competing Values Framework. Journal of Human Resource management 11 (2), 388-412.
  • Diamantopoulos, A., Winklhofer, H.M., 2001. Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development. Journal of Marketing Research 38 (2), 269-277.
  • Dillman, D.A., 1978. Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. Wiley & Sons Inc, New York.
  • Dougherty, D., 1992. Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organization Science 3 (2), 179-203.
  • Dun, Bradstreet, 2003. Duns 50.000, principales empresas españolas. D&B, Madrid.
  • Dyer, L., Shafer, R., 1999. From human resource strategy to organizational effectiveness: lessons from research in organizational agility. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management. Supplement. 4, 145-174.
  • Fornell, C., Bookstein, F.L., 1982. Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. Journal of Marketing Research 19 (4), 440-452.
  • Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F., 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18 (1), 39-50.
  • Fornell, C., Lorange, P., Roos, J., 1990. The cooperative venture formation process: A latent variable structural modeling approach. Managenment Science 36 (10), 1246-1255.
  • Geisser, S., 1975. The predictive sample reuse method with applications. Journal of the American Statistical Association 70, 320-328.
  • Gerbing, D.W., Anderson, J.C., 1988. An updated paradigm for scale development incorporing unidimensionality and its assessment. Journal of Marketing Research 25, 186-192.
  • Gopalakrishnan, S., Damanpour, F., 1994. Patterns of Generation and Adoption of Innovations in Organizations: Contingency Models of Innovations Atributes. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. 11, 96-116.
  • Graen, G.B., Uhl-Bien, M., 1995. Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Appling a multi-level, multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly 6 (2), 219-247.
  • Grant, R.M., 1996. Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science 7 (4), 375-387.
  • Guns, B., 1998 September. Faster learning. Executive Excellence, 7-8.
  • Hair Jr., J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., Black, W.C., 1999. Análisis multivariante. Prentice Hall, Madrid.
  • Hayek, F.A., 1945. The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review 35, 519-532.
  • Hill, C.W.L., Rothaermel, F., 2003. The performance of incumbent firms in the face of radical technological innovation. Academy of Management Review 28 (2), 257-274.
  • Hisrich, P., 1989. Entrepreneurship. McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA.
  • Hitt, M.A., Bierman, L., Shimizu, K., Kochhar, R., 2001. Direct and moderating effects of human capital on strategy and performance in professional service firms: A resource-based perspective. Academy of Management Journal 44 (1), 13-28.
  • Huber, G.P., Power, D.J., 1985. Retrospective reports of strategic-level managers: guidelines for increasing their accuracy. Strategic Management Journal 6 (2), 171-180.
  • INE, 2000. Encuesta sobre Innovación Tecnológica en las Empresas 1998. Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Madrid.
  • James, W., 2002. Best HR practices for today's innovation management. Research Technology Management 45 (1), 57-60.
  • Jarvis, C.B., Mackenzie, S.B., Podsakoff, P.M., 2003. A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research 30 (2), 199-218.
  • Jassawalla, A., Sashittal, H., 2002. Cultures that support product-innovation processes. Academy of Management Executive 16 (3), 42-54.
  • Kanter, E., 1988. When a thousand flowers bloom: structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organization. Research in Organizational Behavior 10, 169-211.
  • Kleinbaum, D.G., Kupper, L.L., Muller, K.E., 1988. Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariate Analysis Methods. PWS-Kent Publishing Company, Boston.
  • Konrad, A.M., Linnehan, F., 1995. Formalized HRM stuctures: Coordinating equal employment opportunity or concealing organizational practice? Academy of Management Journal 38 (3), 787-820.
  • Kuratko, D., Montagno, R., 1989. Intrapreneurship: Developing innovation in the Corporate culture. Training and Development Journal 43 (10), 83-86.
  • Laursen, K., Foss, N., 2003. New HRM practices, complementarities and the impact on innovation performance. Cambridge Journal of Economics 27 (2), 243-263.
  • Lepak, D.P., Snell, S.A., 1999. The human resource architecture: Toward a theory of human capital allocation and development. Academy of Management Review 24 (1), 31-48.
  • Lepak, D.P., Snell, S.A., 2002. Examining the human resource architecture: The relationships among human capital, employment, and human resource configurations. Journal of Management 28 (4), 517-543.
  • Lohmöller, J.B., 1989. Latent variables path modelling with partial least squares. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg.
  • López Cabrales, A., Pérez-Luño Robledo, A., Valle Cabrera, R., 2009. Knowledge as a mediator between HRM practices and innovative activity. Human Resource Management 48 (4), 485-503.
  • Lumpkin, G.T., Dess, G., 1996. Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking It to Performance. The Academy of Management Review 21 (1), 135-172.
  • March, J., 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science 2 (1), 71-87.
  • Martín de Castro, G., Alama Salazar, E.M., Navas López, J.E., López Sáez, P., 2009. El papel del capital intelectual en la innovación tecnológica. Una aplicación a las empresas de servicios profesionales de España. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa 3 (40), 83-110.
  • Marvel, M.R., Lumpkin, G.T., 2007. Technology Entrepreneurs' Human Capital and Its Effects on Innovation Radicalness. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice 31 (6), 807-828.
  • Mathieson, K., Peacock, E., Chin, W.C., 2001. Extending the technology acceptance model: the influence of perceived user resources. The Database for Advances in Information Systems 32 (3), 86-112.
  • Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., Lampel, J., 1998. Strategy safari. The Free Press, New York.
  • Nonaka, I., 1994. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science 5 (1), 14-37.
  • Nunnally, J., 1978. Psychometrict theory. McGraw-Hill, New York.
  • O'Reilly, C., 1989. Corporations, Culture and Commitment: Motivation and Social Control in organizations. California Management Review 31 (4), 9-25.
  • OECD/Eurostat, 2005. Oslo manual third edition. Guidelines for collecting and interpreting technological innovation data. OECD, Paris.
  • Pavitt, K., 1984. Sectorial patterns of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy 13 (6), 343-373.
  • Pavón, J.E., Hidalgo, A., 1997. Gestión e Innovación: un enfoque estratégico. Ed. Pirámide, Madrid.
  • Perez-Luño Robledo, A., Valle Cabrera, R., Wiklund, J., 2009. De la creatividad al lanzamiento de productos: el papel del conocimiento en los procesos de innovación e imitación. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa (38), 95-118.
  • Podsakoff, N., Shen, W., Podsakoff, P.M., 2006. The role of formative measurement models in stratregic management research: review: critique and implications for future research. In: Ketchen, D., Bergh, D. (Eds.), research methodology in strategic management, 3. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 201-256.
  • Podsakoff, P.M., Organ, D.W., 1986. Self reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management 12 (4), 531-544.
  • Reichers, A.E., Schneider, B., 1990. Climate and culture: An evolution of concepts. In: Schneider, B. (Ed.), organizational climate and culture. Jossey-Bass, Beverly Hills, CA, pp. 5-39.
  • Richter, F., Teramoto, Y., 1995. Intrapreneurship: a new management concept from Japan. Management International Review 35 (Special Issue), 91-104.
  • Russell, R., Russell, C., 1992. An examination of the effects of organizational norms, organizational structure and environmental uncertainty on entrepreneurial strategy. Journal of Management 18 (4), 639-656.
  • Rycroft, R.W., Kash, D., 2002. Path dependence in the innovation of complex technologies. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 14 (1), 21-35.
  • Schein, E., 1996. Culture: The missing concept in organization studies. Administrative Science Quarterly 41 (2), 229-240.
  • Schultz, T.W., 1961. Investment in human capital. American Economic Review 51, 1-17.
  • Scott, S.G., Bruce, R.A., 1998. Following the leader in R&D: The joint effect of subordinate problem-solving style and leader-member relations on innovative behaviour. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 45 (1), 3-10.
  • Sellin, N., 1995. Partial least squares modeling in research on education achievement. In: Bos, W., Lehmann, R.H. (Eds.), reflections on education achievement. Waxmann Verlag, Münster, pp. 256-267.
  • Snell, S.A., Dean, J.W., 1992. Integrated manufacturing and human resources management: A human capital perspective. Academy of Management Journal 35 (3), 467-504.
  • Stoker, J.I., Looise, J.C., Fisscher, O.A.M., de Jong, R.D., 2001. Leadership and innovation: relations between leadership, individual characteristics and the functioning of R&D teams. International Journal of Human Resource Management 12 (7), 1141-1151.
  • Subramaniam, M., Youndt, M.A., 2005. The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management Journal 48 (3), 450-463.
  • Taggar, S., 2002. Individual creativity and group ability to utilize individual creative resources: A multilevel model. Academy of Management Journal 45 (2), 315-330.
  • Takeuchi, R., Lepak, D.P., Wang, H., Takeuchi, K., 2007. An empirical examination of the mechanisms mediating between high performance work systems and the performance of Japanese organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology 92 (4), 1069-1083.
  • Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., Shuen, A., 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal 18 (7), 509-533.
  • Tomaskovic-Devey, D., Leiter, J., Thompson, S., 1994. Organizational survey nonresponse. Administrative Science Quarterly 39 (3), 439-457.
  • Tushman, T., Nadler, D., 1986. Organizing for innovation. California Management Review 28 (3), 74-92.
  • Wang, W., Chang, C., 2005. Intellectual capital and performance in causal models: Evidence from the information technology industry in Taiwan. Journal of Intellectual Capital 6 (2), 222-236.
  • Wiklund, J., Shepherd, D., 2003. Knowledge-based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium-sized businesses. Strategic Management Journal 24 (13), 1307-1314.
  • Wiklund, J., Shepherd, D., 2005. Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: a configurational approach. Journal of Business Venturing 20 (1), 71-91.
  • Woodman, R., Sawyer, J., Griffin, R., 1993. Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review 18 (2), 293-321.
  • Zahra, S., George, G., 2002. Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review 27 (2), 185-203.
  • Zander, U., Kogut, B., 1995. Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test. Organization Science 6 (1), 76-92.