Análisis de la percepción de los estudiantes sobre las áreas de intervención del futuro educador y trabajador social a través de una didáctica digital con mapas conceptuales multimedia

  1. López Meneses, Eloy
  2. Vázquez Cano, Esteban
  3. Fernández Márquez, Esther
Journal:
RED: revista de educación a distancia

ISSN: 1578-7680

Year of publication: 2014

Issue: 41

Type: Article

More publications in: RED: revista de educación a distancia

Abstract

This diachronic study describes a university innovative experience consisting on the development of multimedia concept maps in order to analyze the students' perception on the main intervention areas of the future educator and social worker. These multimedia concept maps were implemented by students who attended the Information Technologies and Communication subject, corresponding to the Degree in Social Education and dual Degree in Social Education and Work during academic years 2010-13 at Pablo Olavide University (Seville-Spain). A qualitative and descriptive method was implemented to analyze 213 MCMs created by students. Among the most relevant conclusions, we can highlight that multimedia concept maps are a highly interactive and collaborative digital resource and specially beneficial in its application to social studies. Students were able to identify and categorize main intercultural an community areas of social and educational intervention, as follows: Seniors (67%), children, teens and drug dependence (63%), people with disabilities (50%), adults (38%), mental health (31%), socio-community care (24%) and immigrants (21%)

Bibliographic References

  • Aguaded, J. I., López Meneses, E. y Jaén, A. (2013). Portafolios electrónicos universitarios para una nueva metodología de enseñanza superior. Desarrollo de un material educativo multimedia (MEM). Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento (RUSC), 10 (1), 7-28. Recuperado el 11/11/2013 de http://journals.uoc.edu/ojs/index.php/rusc/article/view/v10n1-aguaded-lopezjaen/v10n1-aguaded-lopez-jaen-es
  • Aguaded, J. I., López Meneses, E., y Alonso, L. (2010). Innovating with Blogs in University Courses: a Qualitative Study. The New Educational Review, 22 (3-4), 103-115. Recuperado el 8/11/2013 de http://www.educationalrev.us.edu.pl/volume22.htm
  • Bogdan, R.C. y Biklen, S.K. (1992). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (2nd Ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Cabero, J.; López Meneses, E., y Ballesteros, C. (2009). Experiencias universitarias innovadoras con blogs para la mejora de la praxis educativa en el contexto europeo. Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento (RUSC). 6, 2. Recuperado el 11/11/2013 de http://www.uoc.edu/ojs/index.php/rusc/article/view/v6n2_cabero_etal
  • Castañeda, L. y Adell, J. (eds.). (2013). Entornos personales de aprendizaje: claves para el ecosistema educativo en red. Alcoy: Marfil.
  • Castañeda, M.B., Cabrera, A.F. Navarro, Y., y Vries, W. (2010). Procesamiento de datos y análisis estadísticos utilizando SPSS: un libro práctico para investigadores y administradores educativos. Porto Alegre: EDIPUCRS.
  • Estrada, V. y Febles, P. (2000). Mapas conceptuales para la enseñanza de Nuevas Tecnologías. XVI Simposio Sociedad Mexicana de Computación en Educación, Monterrey, México.
  • Gómez Lucas, M.C. y Álvarez Teruel, J. D. (coords.) (2011). El trabajo colaborativo como indicador de calidad del Espacio Europeo de Educación Superior. Alcoy: Marfil.
  • Horton, P., McConney, A., Gallo, M., Woods, A, Senn, G., y Hamelin, D. (1993). An investigation of the effectiveness of concept mapping as an instructional tool. Science Education, 77, 95-111.
  • Karabacak, A. (2012). Care plans using concept maps and their effects on the critical thinking dispositions of nursing students. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 18, 233-239.
  • Keppensa, J. y Hayb, D. (2008). Concept map assessment for teaching computer programming. Computer Science Education, 18, 31-42.
  • Kinchin, I.M. (2000). Using concept maps to reveal understanding: A two-tier analysis. School Science Review, 81 (296), 6-41.
  • Kitsantas, A. y Dabbagh, N. (2010). Learning to learn with integrative learning technologies (ILT): A practical guide for academic success. Estados Unidos: Information Age Publishing.
  • Linnenbrink, E. y Pintrich, P. (2003). The role of self-efficacy beliefs in student engagement and learning in the classroom. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19, 119-137.
  • López Meneses, E. y Vázquez-Cano, E. (2013). WEB 2.0 Tools for social Educator training in Higher Education. International Journal of Research In Social Sciences, 3 (2); 1-13. Recuperado el 11/11/2013 de http://ijsk.org/uploads/3/1/1/7/3117743/1_education_trainning_tool.pdf
  • Lucian, P., Schalk, R., & Schruijer, S. (2010). The Use of Cognitive Mapping in Eliciting and Evaluating Group Cognitions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40 (5), 1258-1291.
  • Miles, M.B. y Huberman, A.M. (1994) Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Millis, B.J. y Rhem, J. (2010). Cooperative Learning in Higher Education. Across the Disciplines, across the Academy. Virginia: Stylus Publishing.
  • Muñoz, J.M. (2010). Los mapas mentales como técnica para integrar y potenciar el aprendizaje holístico en la formación inicial de maestros/as .(Tesis inédita de doctorado). Córdoba: Universidad de Córdoba.
  • Novak, J. (2000). The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How To Construct Them. Recuperado el 11/11/2013 de http://www.stanford.edu/dept/SUSE/projects/ireport/articles/concept_maps/The%20Theory%20Underlying%20Concept%20Maps.pdf
  • Novak, J.D. & Cañas, A. J. (2008). The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How to Construct Them. Technical Report IHMC CmapTools 2006-01 Rev 01-2008. Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition. Recuperado el 11/11/2013 de http://cmap.ihmc.us/Publications/ResearchPapers/TheoryUnderlyingConceptMaps.pdf
  • Pool-Cibrian, W.J. y Martínez-Guerrero J.I. (2013). Autoeficacia y uso de estrategias para el aprendizaje autorregulado en estudiantes universitarios. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 15(3), 21-37. Recuperado de http://redie.uabc.mx/vol15no3/contenido-pool-mtnez.html
  • Ruiz-Primo, M. y Shavelson, R. (1996). Problems and issues in the use of concept maps in science assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(6), 569-600.
  • Schworm, S. y Gruber, H. (2012). E-Learning in universities: Supporting help-seeking processes by instructional prompts. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43, 272–281.
  • Tuñez, M. y Sixto, J. (2012). Las redes sociales como entorno docente: análisis del uso de facebook en la docencia universitaria. Pixel Bit, Revista de Medios y Educación, 41, 77-92.
  • Tzeng, J. (2009). Designs of concept maps and their impacts on readers' performance in memory and reasoning while reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 33 (2),128-147.
  • UNESCO. (2013). Enfoques estratégicos sobre las TIC en Educación en América Latina y el Caribe. Chile: OREALC/UNESCO Santiago. Recuperado el 11/11/2013 de http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/FIELD/Santiago/images/ticse sp.pdf
  • Vázquez-Cano, E., López Meneses, E., y Fernández Márquez, E. (2013). Concept Mapping For Developing Competencies in European Higher Education Area. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3(17), 7-18. Recuperado el 15/11/2013 de http://www.ijhssnet.com/index.php/indexes.html
  • Vázquez-Cano, E; Méndez, J.M; Román, P., y López Meneses, E. (2013). Diseño y desarrollo del modelo pedagógico de la plataforma educativa Quantum University Project. Revista Campus Virtuales, 1(2), 54-63.
  • Zimmerman, B.J. y Schunk, D. (2011). Self-regulated learning and performance an introduction and an overview. En B. J. Zimmerman y D. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance. Routledge.