Análisis y valoración del Área de Educación del III Plan de Acción para Personas con Discapacidad en la Comunidad de Madrid (2012-2015)
- Gerardo Echeita Sarrionandia 1
- Cecilia Simón Rueda 1
- Carmen Márquez Vázquez 1
- María Luz de los Milagros Fernández Blázquez 1
- Helena Pérez de la Merced 1
- Amparo Moreno Hernández 1
-
1
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
info
ISSN: 0210-1696
Year of publication: 2017
Volume: 48
Issue: 1
Pages: 51-71
Type: Article
More publications in: Siglo Cero: Revista Española sobre Discapacidad Intelectual
Metrics
Cited by
- Dialnet Metrics Cited by: 5 (24-02-2023)
SCImago Journal Rank
- Year 2017
- SJR Journal Impact: 0.134
- Best Quartile: Q4
- Area: Psychology (miscellaneous) Quartile: - Rank in area: 218/259
- Area: Social Psychology Quartile: - Rank in area: 245/303
- Area: Social Work Quartile: - Rank in area: 55/58
- Area: Education Quartile: - Rank in area: 997/1497
- Area: Psychiatry and Mental Health Quartile: Q4 Rank in area: 477/580
Índice Dialnet de Revistas
- Year 2017
- Journal Impact: 0.240
- Field: TRABAJO SOCIAL Quartile: C2 Rank in field: 11/53
- Field: EDUCACIÓN Quartile: C2 Rank in field: 96/236
- Field: PSICOLOGÍA Quartile: C3 Rank in field: 50/116
CIRC
- Social Sciences: B
Scopus CiteScore
- Year 2017
- CiteScore of the Journal : 0.3
- Area: Education Percentile: 13
- Area: Psychiatry and Mental Health Percentile: 8
- Area: Psychiatric Mental Health Percentile: 6
- Area: Social Psychology Percentile: 6
Abstract
This paper presents the analysis and assessment of the Education Area of the Plan of Action for Persons with Disabilities in the Autonomous Community of Madrid (2012-2015), carried out after using a Delphi Method with a group of six experts. This work was aimed to make a formative evaluation of the Plan implemented, so that the analysis generated could be used by both managers of the next plan in project, as for educational stakeholders involved in the education field, but obviously, by people with disabilities as well, in order to support them to exercise effectively their rights. The synthesis document shows synthetically the main strengths of the plan but, mostly, the weaknesses or points to improve. Among these should be noted the need of a more efficient structure of programs and actions with clear indicators of achievement. Also there is a need of rethinking current models and areas of intervention, in order to those were much more consistent and coherent with the right to an education inclusive that has been established in the Convention of Rights of People with Disability, and with the models of understanding and intervention to improve their quality of life.
Bibliographic References
- Varela-Ruiz, M., Díaz-Bravo, L. y García-Durán, R. (2012). Descripción y usos del método Delphi en investigaciones del área de la salud. Investigación en Educación Médica, 1 (2), 90-95.
- Naciones Unidas (2006). Convención de los derechos de las personas con discapacidad. Consultado en: http://www.un.org/spanish/disabilities/default.asp?id=497. Recuperado el 15/02/2016.
- Naciones Unidas. CRPD (2016). General comment N.º 4 (2016). Article 24: Right to inclusive education. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Recuperado de http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/CRPD/Pages/CRPDIndex.aspx. Traducción de M. Á.Verdugo y J. M. Amor en: http://sid.usal.es/idocs/F1/ACT56067/DerechoalaEducacionInclusivaArt24.pdf.
- Schalock, R. y Verdugo, M. Á. (2007). El concepto de calidad de vida en los servicios y apoyos para personas con discapacidad intelectual. Siglo Cero, 38 (4), 21-36.
- Urien, T. (2017). Del reconocimiento legal al reconocimiento efectivo. De la igual dignidad como un derecho de la persona con discapacidad intelectual o del desarrollo. Un proceso que nos interpela. Siglo Cero, 47 (2), 43-62.
- Varela-Ruiz, M., Díaz-Bravo, L. y García-Durán, R. (2012). Descripción y usos del método Delphi en investigaciones del área de la salud. Investigación en Educación Médica, 1 (2), 90-95.