Guerra química en la I y II Guerras Mundiales

  1. Jáuregui-Lobera, Ignacio 1
  1. 1 Instituto de Ciencias de la Conducta y Universidad Pablo de Olavide de Sevilla. España
Journal of Negative and No Positive Results: JONNPR

ISSN: 2529-850X

Year of publication: 2020

Volume: 5

Issue: 2

Pages: 218-235

Type: Article

DOI: 10.19230/JONNPR.3388 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: Journal of Negative and No Positive Results: JONNPR


The objective of this review is to analyze the use of chemical warfare during the two great World Wars of the twentieth century. The review of the current literature will also allow to know if the reasons for its use persist at present, what level of development chemical weapons have reached and if there is a scientific and technical potential to increase this development. First of all, a searching procedure for scientific articles was carried out, and, secondly, thematic areas were established in order to expose the results (chemical agents, chemical weapons, general effects of chemical agents, chemical risk and possible defense against chemical attack). The misuse of chemical science has given rise to these painful events (the preparation and use of chemical weapons). But it would be necessary to consider many other aspects such as medicines, insecticides, herbicides, preservatives, disinfectants, and others, in which chemistry has been the solution to complex problems that guarantee a significant improvement in living conditions. Once again, chemistry is not really to blame; they are ethical and sociological dilemmas, mixed with political leaders, that make a science to be used in a responsible way for the good of humanity or, on the contrary, as a destructive weapon.  

Bibliographic References

  • Villalonga L. Historia de la Guerra Química. Características y mecanismos de aplicación en la guerra y en el terrorismo. Monografías de la Real Academia Nacional de Farmacia. Madrid (Monografía XVI): Real Academia Nacional de Farmacia; 2005.
  • Pitschmann V. Overall view of chemical and biochemical weapons. Toxins 2014; 6:1761-1784.
  • Ivanov VA. Brief comment on publication “First chemical mass attack in history of wars, Bolimow, January 31, 1915”. Przegl Epidemiol 2013; 67: 92.
  • Zieliński A. First chemical mass attack in history of wars, Bolimów, January 31, 1915. Przegl Epidemiol 2010; 64: 449-53.
  • Hinds J (23 February 2009). Very, Very Early Torpedoes. Great History. Archivado del original el 2 de noviembre de 2013. Recuperado el 02 de julio de 2019. Disponible en:
  • Williamson Mitch (21 April 2013). Hassan Al Rammah. Weapons and Warfare-Military History and Hardware. Archivado del original el 17 de noviembre de 2013. Recuperado el 02 de julio de 2019. Disponible en:
  • Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006; 3: 77-101.
  • Padley AP. Gas: the greatest terror of the Great War. Anaesth Intensive Care 2016; 44 Suppl: 24-30.
  • Buffetaut Y. Ypres, 22nd April 1915: The first gas attack. Louviers (France): Ysec Editions; 2008.
  • Fitzgerald GJ. Chemical warfare and medical response during World War I. Am J Public Health 2008; 98: 611- 25.
  • Norris JE. The manufacture of war gases in Germany. Ind Eng Chem 1919; 11: 817.
  • Jones E. Terror Weapons: The British experience of gas and its treatment in the First World War. War Hist 2014; 21: 355-375.
  • Sidell FR, Takafuji ET, Franz DR (Eds.). Medical Aspects of Chemical and Biological Warfare. Washington, DC: Office of the Surgeon General; 1997.
  • Smart JK. History of chemical and biological warfare: An American perspective. En: United States. Department of the Army. Textbook of Military Medicine: Medical Aspects of Chemical and Biological Warfare. Washington, DC: Office of the Surgeon General; 1997.
  • Brophy LP, Fisher GJB. The Chemical Warfare Service: Organizing for War. Washington, DC: Office of the Chief of Military History; 1959. p. 3-18, 25-27, 424-471.
  • Williams M, Sizemore DC. Biologic, Chemical, and Radiation Terrorism Review. StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2019.
  • Darchini-Maragheh E, Balali-Mood M. Delayed complications and long-term management of sulfur mustard poisoning: Recent advances by Iranian researchers (Part I of II). Iran J Med Sci 2018; 43:103-124.
  • Poursaleh Z, Harandi AA, Vahedi E, Ghanei M. Treatment for sulfur mustard lung injuries; new therapeutic approaches from acute to chronic phase. Daru 2012; 20:27.
  • Hosseini-khalili A, Haines DD, Modirian E, Soroush M, Khateri S, Joshi R, Zendehdel K, et al. Mustard gas exposure and carcinogenesis of lung. Mutat Res 2009; 678:1-6.
  • Li C, Srivastava RK, Athar M. Biological and environmental hazards associated with exposure to chemical warfare agents: arsenicals. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2016; 1378:143-157.
  • Kaise T, Kinoshita K. Chemical treatment and decomposition technique of the chemical warfare agents containing arsenicals. Yakugaku Zasshi 2009; 129: 45-51.
  • Jones E, Palmer I, Wessely S. Enduring beliefs about effects of gassing in war: qualitative study. BMJ 2007; 335: 1313-5.
  • Martín M, Pinto G, Hernández JM, Martín MT. Cien años de armas químicas. An Quím 2015; 111: 224-229.
  • Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW). The Chemical Weapons Convention: A Synopsis of the Text. The Hague: OPCW; 2017.