A longitudinal study of L2 historical writingLexical richness and writing proficiency in Content and Language Integrated Learning

Referencias bibliográficas

• Achugar, M. & B. Carpenter (2014). "Tracking movement toward academic language in multilingual classrooms”. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 14: 60-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.12.002
• Achugar, M. & M. J. Schleppegrell (2005). “Beyond connectors: The construction of cause in history textbooks”. Linguistics and Education 16(3): 298-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2006.02.003
• Asención-Delaney, Y. & Y. Collentine (2011). “A multidimensional analysis of a written L2 Spanish corpus”. Applied Linguistics 32: 299-322. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amq053
• Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & L. Gulikers (1995). The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Linguistic Data Consortium.
• Barber, H. A., Otten, L. J., Kousta, S. T., & G. Vigliocco (2013). “Concreteness in word processing: ERP and behavioral effects in a lexical decision task”. Brain & Language 125: 47-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2013.01.005
• Biber, D. (1992). “The Multi-Dimensional Approach to Linguistic Analyses of Genre Variation: An Overview of Methodology and Findings”. Computers and the Humanities 26(5/6): 331-345.
• Britton, J., Martin, N., & H. Rosen (1966). Multiple Marking of Compositions. London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office.
• Christie, F. & K. Maton (2011). Disciplinarity: Functional linguistic and sociological perspectives. London: Continuum.
• Christie, F. (2012). Language education: A functional perspective. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
• Coffin, C. (2006). “Reconstructing personal time as collective time: Learning the dis-course of history” in R. Whittaker, M. O’Donnell, M. & A. McCabe (eds.), Language and literacy: Functional approaches, 15-45. London: Continuum.
• Coffin, C. (2009). Historical discourse. London: Continuum.
• Crossley, S. A., & D. S. McNamara (2011). “Understanding expert ratings of essay quality: Coh-Metrix analyses of first and second language writing”. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life Long Learning 21(2-3): 170–191. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCEELL.2011.040197
• Crossley, S. A., & D. S. McNamara. (2012). “Predicting second language writing proficiency: The roles of cohesion and linguistic sophistication”. Journal of Research in Reading 35(2): 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01449.x
• Crossley, S. A., Kyle, K., Allen, L. K., Gou, L., & D. S. McNamara (2014). “Linguistic microfeatures to predict L2 writing proficiency: A case study in automated writing evaluation”. Journal of Writing Assessment, 7 (1).
• Crossley, S. A., Roscoe, R. D., McNamara, D. S., & A. Graesser. (2011) “Predicting human scores of essay quality using computational indices of linguistic and textual features” in G. Biswas, S. Bull, J. Kay, & A. Mitrovic (Eds.), Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, 438-440. New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21869-9_62
• Crossley, S. A., Salsbury, T., McNamara, D. S., & S. Jarvis (2010). “Predicting lexical proficiency in language learner texts using computational indices”. Language Testing 28(4): 561–580. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532210378031
• Crossley, S. A., Weston, J., McLain Sullivan, S. T., & D. S. McNamara (2011). The development of writing proficiency as a function of grade level: A linguistic analysis. Written Communication 28(3): 282-311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088311410188
• Crossley, S.A. (2020). “Linguistic features in writing quality and development: An overview”. Journal of Writing Research 11(3): 415-443. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2020.11.03.01
• Cummins, J. (1979). “Cognitive/academic language proficiency, linguistic interdependence, the optimum age question and some other matters”. Working Papers on Bilingualism 19: 121-129.
• Deane, M., & P. O’Neill (2011). Writing in the Disciplines. London and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Dóczi, B. & J. Kormos (2016). Longitudinal Developments in Vocabulary Knowledge and Lexical Organization. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Douglas, R. D. (2013). “The lexical breadth of undergraduate novice level writing competency”. The Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics 16(1): 152-170.
• Dressen-Hammouda, D. (2008). “From novice to disciplinary expert: disciplinary identity and genre mastery’”. English for Specific Purposes 27(2): 233-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2007.07.006
• Ellis, N. (2002). “Frequency Effects in Language Processing: A Review with Implications for Theories of Implicit and Explicit Language Acquisition”. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24(2): 143-188. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102002024
• Ellis, N. C. (2012). “Formulaic language and second language acquisition: Zipf and the phrasal teddy bear”. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 32: 17–44. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190512000025
• Engber, C. A. (1995). “The relationship of lexical proficiency to the quality of ESL compositions”. Journal of Second Language Writing 4(2): 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/1060-3743(95)90004-7
• Flowerdew, J. (2014). “Corpus-based approach to language description for specialized academic writing.’” Language Teaching 50: 90-106. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444814000378
• Gardner, S., Nesi, H. & D. Biber (2019) “Discipline, level, genre: Integrating situational perspectives in a new MD analysis of university student writing”. Applied Linguistics 40(4): 646–674. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy005
• Grabe, W. (2002). “Narrative and expository macro-genres” in A. N. Johns (ed), Genre in the classroom: Multiple perspectives. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
• Grant, L. &A. Ginther (2000). Using computer-tagged linguistic features to describe L2 writing differences. Journal of Second Language Writing 9: 123–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1060-3743(00)00019-9
• Grobe, C. (1981). “Syntactic maturity, mechanics, and vocabulary as predictors of quality ratings”. Research in the Teaching of English 15(1): 75–85.
• Guo, L., Crossley, S. A., & D. S. McNamara (2013). “Predicting human judgments of essay quality in both integrated and independent second language writing samples: A comparison study”. Assessing Writing 18(3): 218-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2013.05.002
• Halliday, M. A. K. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Harmon, Z. & V. Kapatsinski (2017). “Putting old tools to novel uses: The role of form accessibility in semantic extension”. Cognitive Psychology 98: 22-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.08.002
• Harwood, N. & G. Hadley (2004). “Demystifying institutional practices: critical pragmatism and the teaching of academic writing”. English for Specific Purposes 23(4): 355-377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2003.08.001
• Haswell, R. (2000). “Documenting improvement in college writing: A longitudinal approach”. Written Communication 17(3): 307–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088300017003001
• Hornberger, N. (2004). “The Continua of Biliteracy and the Bilingual Educator: Educational Linguistics in Practice”. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 7(2): 155-171. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853597565-004
• Jarvis, S. (2002).” Short texts, best-fitting curves and new measures of lexical diversity”. Language Testing 19(1): 57–84. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532202lt220oa
• Jarvis, S. (2013). “Capturing the diversity in lexical diversity”. Language Learning 63(Supplement 1): 87–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00739.x
• Jarvis, S. (2017). “Grounding lexical diversity in human judgments”. Language Testing 34(4): 537–553. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532217710632
• Jarvis, S., Grant, L., Bikowski, D., & D. Ferris (2003). Exploring multiple profiles of highly rated learner compositions. Journal of Second Language Writing 12(4): 377–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2003.09.001
• Kuiken, F., & I. Vedder (2014). “Rating written performance: What do raters do and why?” Language Testing 31(3): 329–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532214526174
• Kyle, K., & S. A. Crossley (2016). “The relationship between lexical sophistication and independent and source-based writing”. Journal of Second Language Writing 34(4): 12-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.10.003
• Lahuerta Martínez, A. C. (2015). “The Written Competence of Spanish Secondary Education Students in Bilingual and Non-­Bilingual Programs”. Porta Linguarum 24: 74-61. https://doi.org/10.30827/Digibug.53796
• Laufer, B., & P. Nation (1995). “Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production”. Applied Linguistics 16: 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/16.3.307
• Malvern, D., Richards, B., Chipere, N., & P. Durán (2004). Lexical diversity and language development: Quantification and assessment. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-51180-4
• McCarthy, P. M. & S. Jarvis (2010). “MTLD, vocd-D, and HD-D: A validation study of sophisticated approaches to lexical diversity assessment”. Behavior Research Methods 42(2): 381-392. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.2.381
• McNamara, D. S., Crossley, S. A., & P. M. McCarthy. (2010). Linguistic features of writing quality. Written Communication 27(1): 57–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088309351547
• McNamara, D. S., Crossley, S. A., & R. Roscoe (2013). “Natural Language Processing in an Intelligent Writing Strategy Tutoring System”. Behavior Research Methods 45(2): 499-515. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0258-1
• McNamara, D. S., Louwerse, M. M., Cai, Z. & A. Graesser (2014). Automated Evaluation of Text and Discourse with Coh-Metrix. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Mohan, B., Leung, C. & C. Davison (2001). English as a Second Language in the Mainstream. London: Pearson Education.
• Nikula, T. (2017). “Emerging themes, future research directions” in A. Llinares & T. Morton (eds.), Applied Linguistics Perspectives on CLIL, 307-313. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Nokes, J. D. (2013). Building students’ historical literacies: Learning to read and reason with historical texts and evidence. New York: Routledge.
• Nold, E. W., & S. W. Freedman (1977). An analysis of readers’ responses to essays. Research in the Teaching of English 11(2): 164–174.
• Ortega, L. & H. Byrnes (eds.). (2008). The Longitudinal Study of Advanced L2 Capacities. New York: Routledge.
• Pellicer-Sánchez, A. (2018). “Examining second language vocabulary growth. Replications of Schmitt (1998) and Webb & Chang (2012)”. Language Teaching 52(4): 512-523. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144481800037X
• Prediger, S. & K. Hein (2017). “Learning to meet language demands in multi-step mathematical argumentations: Design research on a subject-specific genre”. European Journal of Applied Linguistics 5(2): 309-337. https://doi.org/10.1515/eujal-2017-0010
• Reppen, R. (1994). Variation in elementary student language: A multi-dimensional perspective. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff.
• Rose, D. (2008). “Writing as linguistic mastery: The development of genre-based literacy pedagogy” in R. Beard, D. Myhill, J. Riley, & M. Nystrand (eds.), Handbook of Writing Development, 151–166. London: Sage.
• Schleppegrel, M.J. & M. C. Colombi. (2002). Developing advanced literacy in first and second languages. Mawhaw: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Shanahan, T. & C. Shanahan (2008). “Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents. Rethinking content-area literacy”. Harvard Educational Review 78: 40-59. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.78.1.v62444321p602101
• Spöttl, C. & M. Mccarthy (2004). “Comparing the knowledge of formulaic sequences across L1, L2, L3 and L4” in N. Schmitt (ed.), Formulaic sequences: Acquisition, processing and use, 191-225. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Tracy-Ventura, N., Mitchell, R. & K. McManus (2016). “The LANGSNAP longitudinal learner corpus. Design and use” in M. Alonso-Ramos (ed.), Spanish Learner Corpus Research. Current trends and future perspectives, 117-142. Amsterdam, John Benjamins.
• Vanhove, J., Bonvin, A., Lambelet, A., & R. Berthele (2019) Predicting perceptions of the lexical richness of short French, German, and Portuguese texts using text-based indices. Journal of Writing Research 10(3): 499-525. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2019.10.03.04
• White, H. (2010). In R. Doran (Ed.), The fiction of narrative: Essays on history, literature, and theory, 1957-2007. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
• Wolfe-Quintero, K, Inagaki, S. & K. Hae-Youn (1998). Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy, and complexity. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.
• Young, A., & T. Fulwiler (1986). Writing Across the Disciplines: Research into Practice. Upper Montclair, NJ: Boynton/Cook.